Saturday, August 1, 2026

Stay in Amsterdam

Asher Kaufman, at 18, set out on June 28, 2025, for a yearlong trip to help spread the Children's Rosary in Europe and Africa. He spent the months of July, August and the first two weeks in September in France. He went on to visit Belgium, Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar, South Africa, Cameroon, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Lesotho, Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia and Italy. This most recent post highlights his arrival in the Netherlands. Asher has a love of history which animates this post.

Upon stepping aboard the train bound for Amsterdam at the beginning of June after the end of my time in Germany, I had some decisions to make regarding where I would stay and what I would be trying to do during my time in the city. I had originally intended to go because the head of the Marriage and Family Institute in the Archdiocese of Utrecht had agreed to an appointment with me to discuss potential formation of Children’s Rosary groups in that See. However, for the other days, I was quite open. What was I going to do for that week? Well, for the first day, the day I arrived, I had discovered online that there would be a Eucharistic procession through the city in honor of the Feast of Corpus Christi. Attending would be the Bishop of Haarlem-Amsterdam as well as numerous priests of the diocese. I resolved to be there if I could.

As I sat on the train, flipping through pages of hotel options on TripAdvisor and Booking.com, I was blessed to find a place just steps from the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwkerk, a beautiful nineteenth century neogothic Church dedicated to our Lady right in the downtown. The procession was scheduled to begin and end at this Church.

The train pulled into Amsterdam Centraal, and I hurried out onto the front door to catch a cab to the hotel. The hotel was a very quaint Amsterdam Canal house originally built in the eighteenth century. Its creaking wooden floors and banistered staircases were enclosed by beautifully wallpapered walls and elegant paintings. The front of the house was typical of a canal house with twelve windows stacked onto four floors, three on each floor. The façade of each house touches that of its neighbors even though the color scheme and detail of each one is distinct. The roof includes a curved ornament on each corner not unlike the concave top corners of many baroque churches in Rome, such as Santa Maria in Traspontina. The staircases inside were winding and steep as well as quite small; I was often worried about missing my footing and falling all the way down, especially when carrying up my bags. It hardly needs to be said there were no elevators. 

Having left my bags in my room and taken what materials I needed for my expedition, I set out to chase down the Procession which had already left the Church by the time I arrived. With the help of a nice public works employee and his printed out map, I managed to track down where they had gone.

At last I turned a corner and saw before me a large mass of people with a large white and gold-rimmed baldacchino at the front under which a prelate walked slowly, holding aloft the Sacred Host. The prayers of the Rosary wafted over the gentle early summer air interspersed with Church hymns sung by a band walking near the front and projected over loudspeakers. At the back two police cars escorted the group to prevent an errant driver or bicyclist from accidentally coming in from behind, always a risk in Amsterdam’s narrow but busy little canal roads. The decades of the Rosary were prayed in a different language, alternating between Dutch, Spanish, English, French, Portuguese, Italian, and Latin. When we reached a bridge over one of the canals, the bishop stopped, turned toward the downtown of the city and solemnly blessed it with the Host while we all kneeling around in a semicircle. It was a blessed experience. A little boy in the front stood with his father and threw flower petals from a basket in front of the monstrance as it passed.


As we passed streetcorners, delivery and cab car drivers, bicyclists (which are a legion in Amsterdam), and pedestrians were all stopped in their tracks by our stately and slow-moving procession. Some people were simply annoyed at the interruption from the expressions on their faces and some simply stared with a neutral expression on their faces, clearly resolved to simply wait out the delay. Others still seemed a bit mesmerized by what they saw; certainly there was something a bit beckoning, almost quixotic, about what was transpiring in the middle of this loud, crowded, pulsating city, as though these busy modern men with their earbuds in their ears, their satellite-driven GPSs in front of them, and their pressing engagements carefully filed away in digital calendars were suddenly confronted by something entirely unexpected and nearly inexplicable. Here was a line of people singing and walking slowly through the streets, following a sort of standard or icon. Were they protesting? Surely not, for they did not seem in the least angry. Were they celebrating? Perhaps, but not in the usual way, for there was no shouting, no drinking, no laxation of the typical norms of behavior. No, indeed; everyone seemed quite serious, reverent, but yet joyful. It was an event that a modern man could perhaps understand but could hardly comprehend, a relic from a past age, yet here it was not hidden away in some church but calmly making its way through the public streets in ways that the Catholics of Amsterdam would only have dreamt of during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Some people we passed were clearly quite moved; they removed their caps or even knelt down.

Soon we turned a corner and were back at the Church from where we had started. We filed in, reposed the Eucharist, and went into an adjoining hall for some refreshments.

The local bishop, Mgr. Hendriks, was at this time of fellowship, and I was able to meet him and make contact. He seemed to quite like the Children’s Rosary.

That evening, I went to Mass at the Kirjtberg parish, another beautiful neogothic Church in the heart of the city. This church was built in the nineteenth century, after the emancipation of Catholics in the Netherlands. It was designed by Friedrich Mengelberg, a German-Dutch architect who also incidentally completed much work on the Cologne Cathedral as well. The interior of the church is quite stunning, marked by very colorful stained glass windows behind the apse.

After becoming a bit more acquainted with the city and spending the evening taking a leisurely walk through the canal streets of the Grachtengordel, I returned to my hotel and went to bed.

The next day, I set out for the nearby city of Haarlem. The original idea was to attempt to find the offices of the bishop to discover the official means of requesting an appointment with him, but I became enmeshed in frustrating difficulties.

To begin, the address I visited that was listed online as the official bishop’s offices were not in fact his but rather those of the diocesan administration. No, I was told; the archbishop’s offices were to be found near the Cathedral of St. Bavo. After discovering this, I walked the mile or so back to the center of town to where my GPS indicated St. Bavo was located. I came in through the central town square where a large farmer’s market was struggling to continue its services in the rainy and chilly morning weather. I observed the large Gothic Church, with its stone upper level and façade and brick lower level. It looked just as a proper parish church in a large city should, and I began setting about looking for the bishop’s offices. I poked my head into the visitor’s entrance to the church and was greeted by a sign informing me that entrance to the building would cost five euros. How strange, I thought, for a Catholic church to charge an entrance fee. I thought perhaps I might ask whether the bishop’s office was nearby. Indeed I was quite surprised when I found out that the church was not the one I was seeking at all but that there were two by the same name in Haarlem. I had gone to the older, Protestant St. Bavo’s. It was from the Middle Ages and had been turned into a Calvinist Church during the Reformation. 

The other St. Bavo’s, some distance away, was a twentieth century mammoth construction somewhat like the Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Brussels.

After having made the mistake in a town with two churches of the same name of going to the wrong one, I made my way to the correct one. After some finagling with my maps application, I figured out where the bishop’s office was. By the end, I had been given an email to write to and had lodged my petition for an appointment with the competent authorities and had thus satisfied the reason for my going to Haarlem. Moreover, I could see stormclouds moving in, and, not wishing to become captive to one of those lazy Dutch rain showers while on the road, I headed back to my lodging.

The next morning was the day appointed for my meeting at the diocesan offices of Utrecht. I met Ms. Elisabeth Bangma-Mertens, the head of the Marriage and Family Institute for the Archdiocese of Utrecht. We had a very positive meeting and discussed ways the Children’s Rosary could become present in the diocese to help child and really family engagement. She was already familiar with the Consecration book due to Cardinal Eijk’s involvement with it and support of it. Overall, I think there is hope to get the Children’s Rosary off the ground there once the summer holidays end.

After our meeting, I decided before leaving town to roam around a little bit through the street canals. In Utrecht, unlike in Amsterdam, one can walk at water level. This is quite nice, except when one comes to a low bridge where the walkway disappears and finds one has to retrace one’s steps.

I also clambered up the Dom tower of Utrecht, the tallest church tower in the Netherlands. The nave of the Church connected to it partially collapsed in the seventeenth century, so now a courtyard separates it from the church. It is quite high, but the view is breathtaking. One can even see Amsterdam on a clear day. It made me contemplate how men must have worked on the very highest points of that building knowing fully well the likelihood of their falling off and dying.

Just before I left Utrecht, I was thinking to myself that I needed to get myself some lunch. I happened as I sauntered down a street to catch sight of a South African flag waving in the early afternoon breeze. Intrigued but not entirely surprised given Holland and South Africa’s colonial connection, I decided to take a look. It was a store run by two South African expats from the Johannesburg area. They had moved up to Europe some years before and had some South African classics for sale, including biltong. I ended up purchasing some Shepherd’s pies which, I only realized when they put in the bag, were frozen.

Well, I thought, this just got a bit more challenging.

With my frozen pies in hand, I caught the train back to my hotel in Amsterdam. The manager was kind enough to let me use the small oven they had downstairs to heat them up, but even with that, when I began to cut into the first one, I discovered the center was still a block of ice. Not wanting to inconvenience the poor man further, I decided to bite the bullet and continue. So I sat there in the chilly afternoon eating my frozen pies.

The next day, I returned to Haarlem for my meeting with the bishop there. He was kind and receptive just as he had been when I saw him after the procession. We had a good talk, and I was very grateful for his having made time. I was able to explore the new St. Bavo’s a bit more and climb the tower there too. I am not quite sure what made me so eager to do all of the climbing, especially since I have a rather acute fear of heights. The actual overlook was quite deserted except for two other visitors who came up after me. After walking around at a dizzying height on the openair deck, I ventured back down through the narrow staircase to the safety of the ground floor.

The following day was one I had been looking forward to. I had purchased tickets to the Rijksmusum, the home of a beautiful collection of Dutch Golden Age paintings. I had seen a few of these during my visit to the Louvre, and it had been one of my favorite parts of that museum. Therefore, I was quite excited to lay eyes on what was housed inside of the Rijksmuseum.

To begin, the itinerary starts with some Northern Renaissance art which depicts figures such as Mary Magdalene and St. Francis. These are very early modern works which are beginning to include rich detail and perspective but still primarily focus on Biblical themes. Important names from this time period would be Carracci and van Scorel.

One of my favorite images comes from the baroque period and is a specialty of Dutch art from that era; it is Jan Brueghel’s Still Life with Flowers in a Glass. It shows a very ostentatious display of flowers all packed into a vase. These were expensive commodities at the time, but they are drawn with such attention to detail as to mesmerize the viewer for a protracted period of time. The leaves, petals and buds, even the small insects are crafted with a precise attention to detail.

The amazing Dutch precision to detail can also be seen in Hendrick Avercamp’s Winter Landscape with Ice Skaters which depicts a village in wintertime. Dozens of small figures fill the picture, and there is a variety of attitudes, fortunes, wealth statuses visible.

Also common in Dutch paintings from the Golden Age is reference to contemporary or recent historical events. For instance, Allegory on the Abdication of Emperor Charles V in Brussels shows the Habsburg Charles V, emperor of one of the most powerful empires in European history dividing his inheritance between Ferdinand his brother to whom he gave the Holy Roman Empire and Phillip, his son, to whom he gave Spain and its holdings (including the Netherlands).

Another such historical painting is Mary Stuart and William II, depicting the royal couple when they were as yet newly married and very very young. Of course, William and Mary would become king and queen of England after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, though in fact William was Dutch and born a stadholder.

One rather unfortunate episode from Dutch history can be seen in Iconoclasm in a Church by Dirck van Delen. It depicts the destruction of statues and altar pieces in churches after the reformation in the Netherlands, something which quite changed the interior of Dutch churches even to this day.



Of course the Rijksmuseum would not be complete without a copious collection dedicated to Rembrandt, including masterpieces like The Jewish Bride, The Standard Bearer, and The Wardens of the Amsterdam Drapers’ Guild. These are, in my opinion, some of the best paintings in the museum.


Romantic elements, coming into vogue at the beginning of the nineteenth century, also make an appearance, such as in the picture shown below of the monk meditating outside the ruins of the monastery at night. The dark, haunting structure and the deep affect of the monk make for kind of mysterious, almost ominous ambiance favored by the Romantic artists.

Needless to say, I am skipping over a great deal of the museum’s collection, but if one wants to look into it further, I believe there are official catalogues of all the paintings available online.

After leaving the Rijksmuseum, I quickly covered the distance to the Van Gogh museum in order to be in time for my reservation there. My mom had encouraged me to go to this one, and, though it would not have been my natural inclination, I was quite happy in the end that I paid it a visit.

The museum was designed to give the visitor more or less a journey through van Gogh’s life. Chronologically, it is a rather short journey since he began to earnestly practice his passion of painting and drawing at age 27 and only continued for about ten years until his death. This period is from 1880 to 1890. His early interest in art specifically is tied to his desire to depict the peasants, the simple folk of the countryside and their ways of living, something I very much understand and admire. His early inspirations were Jules Breton and Jean-Francois Millet. He made some truly beautiful images of the simple joys of country life such as Avenue of Poplars in Autumn.

His first real masterpiece was The Potato Eaters. This painting is quite dark (literally but also a bit figuratively) and shows a family around a table eating a simple repast of potatoes. The faces are hard bitten, and the clothing is simple. Van Gogh was very pleased with what he had been able to convey, something of the reality and also the tragedy of the peasant life.



When in 1886 van Gogh moved to Paris, there were numerous images he made of Montmartre, then the artists’ quarter since it was cheap and still relatively undeveloped.

However, I think some of his best work comes from Arles, the small country town in the south of France where he moved after Paris. There, works like Field with Irises and others are quite striking in their beauty and detail.

Van Gogh had a rather intense personality and likely suffered from some mental illness. He was, however, a deep and affectionate person as is evidenced by the extensive correspondence between himself and his brother, Theo. Theo was an art dealer in Paris who supported him financially and advocated for his work. Vincent painted Almond Blossom in 1890 not long before his death on the occasion of his nephew’s birth. I love that painting particularly for its detail and bright, joyful colors.

Van Gogh died of suicide, and his brother passed away not long after. Theo’s wife, Johanna van Gogh-Bonger is largely responsible for promoting Vincent’s work and making it so well known, even traveling to New York and living there for three years to promote it there.

On the morrow after my visit to the art museums of Amsterdam, I decided to visit a slightly different sight, the Church of Our Lord in the Attic, a clandestine Catholic Church from the seventeenth century now turned into a museum.

Some may know that following the Spanish loss of control over the Netherlands, the United Provinces (as they were called at the time) became Calvinist in their official religion. The practice of Catholicism was tolerated—as long as it was kept out of the public eye. Thus, clandestine churches popped up all over Amsterdam, including this one, which was in the upper floor of a merchant’s canal house. When one enters it, it is quite stunning, containing a full altar, pews, and even an organ.

I also paid visits to the Oude Kerk, a Church completed in the fourteenth century and converted into a Protestant facility in the sixteenth, as well as to the Church of St. Nicholas, built in the nineteenth century when Catholicism was again permitted in public in the Netherlands. Together, these three locations (the Oude Kerk, the Lord in the Attic, and St. Nicholas) are very near to each other and symbolize three different stages of Dutch Catholicism: the pre-Reformation period, the suppression during and after the Reformation period, and then the renewal of public worship in the nineteenth century.


And with that, so ended my time in Amsterdam. It had been a lovely, relaxed, but productive couple of weeks after I had left Assisi.

The next day, I caught my flight for Rome where I met my parents who were flying in from Connecticut the next day. What befell us in Rome and whom we met I will not describe myself. For that, you may refer to the many posts my mom published during our time there.

With this, I now conclude my travel blog. After our time in Rome, we returned to the United States, and in a few weeks’ time, I will begin seminary. I thank those who have followed my trip and prayed for its success, and I hope these posts have provided some edification to all of you.

Thursday, July 23, 2026

The Children's Rosary will be at the WeBelieve Festival at Oscott Seminary, England


If you are attending the WeBelieve Festival July 24-27, 2026 please visit the Children's Rosary booth. Members of the Children's Rosary will also be leading the rosary on Sunday. A special thank you to Sinead and her family for helping to spread the Children's Rosary and organizing these Children's Rosary efforts at the Conference. 

Saturday, July 11, 2026

Come and See Conference in Cologne

Asher Kaufman, at 18, set out on June 28, 2025 for a yearlong trip to help spread the Children's Rosary in Europe and Africa. He spent the months of July, August and the first two weeks in September in France. He went on to visit Belgium, Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar, South Africa, Cameroon, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Lesotho, Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia and Italy. This most recent post highlights his arrival in Germany. Asher has a love of history which animates this post.

The attentive reader will likely note that though we have been posting about our visit to Rome, yet I have also been writing concurrently about visits to Munster and now Cologne, almost as if they were occurring at the same time. In fact, these visits occurred earlier, at the end of May and beginning of June and preceded my arrival in Rome. I apologize for the confusion.

After my return from Munster, Fr. Lammen had a more open day, and so he and I were able to see a bit of the environs where he lives and works as well as some of the other churches of his parish. As you might remember from my last post, that part of Germany, unlike for example in Catholic Bavaria, had historically been a patchwork of Catholic and Lutheran towns as per the Peace of Augsburg that Charles V signed in 1555. We saw that Ferdinand II’s attempts to do away with this accord ended in failure in the dismal, drawn-out defeat that was the Thirty Years’ War. Therefore, the region kept its variety of religious allegiances, and even today, one can identify which village was historically Catholic and which was historically Protestant. Fr. Lammen’s village, Borgloh, was Catholic, but some of the churches in his parish are in towns that were Lutheran. These Catholic churches were constructed later when there was a blurring of the historical divisions and when, such as in the 1960s and 1970s, there were some waves of immigration from places such as Italy. Most of the churches I saw were constructed in the last fifty years, and the oldest was, I believe from the 1920s or so.

The next day was the day we set off from Fr. Lammen’s parish and set our course for Cologne. Cologne is a city with a long history in Germany. Its was established as a Roman city in lower Germania, a province on the northeastern edge of the empire. It marked the boundary between the frontier of the Roman lands and the “barbarian” territory to the east.

During the early Middle Ages, Cologne was part of the Merovingian (Frankish) empire. This was the state that covered what is mostly modern-day France. The Merovingians after the fall of the Roman empire in Gaul had managed to unite the Gallic and Germanic tribes in Burgundy, Aquitane, Austrasia, and Neustria (again, modern day France and western Germany) into one, albeit decentralized, empire. The Merovingians were themselves united by Clovis I, their first king and the first to convert to Catholicism. This was thanks in large part to his holy wife, Saint Clotilde. Thanks to him, the Franks became Nicene Christians, shifting away from the Arians who were quite prevalent at the time. During this time, Charles Martel, famous for his defeat of the Umayyad Caliphate at the Battle of Poitiers, fought a battle near Cologne. This battle resulted from a rival king driving Charles from the city in a challenge to his throne. Charles, nicknamed “the hammer,” spent some lean months in the mountains shoring up his support before falling on the overmatched king and successfully retaking the city of Cologne.

Through the next few hundred years, Cologne became particularly notable for its archbishops who became quite empowered due to the suspicion of Otto I, the Holy Roman Emperor, for the secular nobility. The archbishops came to assume the secular rule of the city and became so powerful that they even became one of the seven electors who chose the Holy Roman Emperor when needed. It was during this time that construction on the famed Cologne Cathedral officially started. This church is an incredible achievement of Gothic architecture and one of the tallest churches in the world. In 1248, the foundation stone was laid by Archbishop Konrad von Hochstaden. This came not long after the city received from Italy the relics of the wise men who visited Jesus. These were such treasured relics that it was decided they would be housed in the new cathedral.  It continued through the next few centuries, with the main nave completed by the sixteenth century, but then work ground to a halt, and a huge crane used in the building process was never taken down for four hundred years, itself becoming a feature of the city’s skyline. Also important to mention is that not long after the construction on the cathedral began, what is commonly regarded as the first Eucharistic procession occurred in Cologne. This was not long after Pope Urban IV instituted the Feast of Corpus Christi.

During the time of Napoleon, the old Holy Roman empire came apart after the Corsican general defeated both them and Prussia at the Battles of Luneville and Jena-Auerstedt. Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and Austria split apart, though the Habsburgs continued to rule over the Kingdom of Austria. Cologne spent the years of Napoleon’s invasion under French control, which ended at the Treaty of Vienna in 1815 after Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo.

Prussia was a power that emerged in the early eighteenth century after the electorate of Brandenburg (one of the key players in the Thirty Years’ War against Ferdinand II) split away from the Holy Roman Empire and formed its own Protestant German state. It had rapidly gained in power and influence throughout the eighteenth century, and it was essential to Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo. At Waterloo, Prussia was cut out of the spoils of the reorganization even though they had contributed much to defeating Napoleon. Europe was reorganized into spheres of influence, and Austria was given regional control over the central European states. This did not sit well at all with the Prussians since, not only were they mostly Protestant and the Austrians mostly Catholic, but the two sides had been on the opposite side of German politics really since the Peace of Augsburg in 1555. They were usually on opposite sides of the balance of power, and throughout the eighteenth century the two leaders, Maria Theresa of Austria and Frederick the Great of Prussia continued this complicated chess match that included the War of the Austrian Succession, the Seven Years’ War, and the War of the Bavarian Succession.

Then came 1848. This was a year that profoundly changed not just German but European politics. It is one of the most important years in the modern history of the continent, and it saw widespread protests, riots, and even rebellions in the name of liberalism, of nationalism, and of universal male suffrage. The old monarchies of Europe were under siege and battered severely. For Austria and Prussia, this concretely saw the rise of German nationalism and the feeling, particularly among the young university-educated intelligentsia, that the German states were at heart one people and ought to be so politically. For too long, so the narrative went, German states had been taken advantage of by the other European great powers, played off against each other like the expendable pawns in a chess match, always on the losing end of whatever war was being fought, always looked down upon, always seen as nothing more than a jumble of hopelessly divided confederations ready to be exploited by everyone else. Indeed, there was much truth to this story. And it became the rallying cry for German unification that was to continue until its eventual fulfillment in 1867. This unification came about through the politicking and negotiations of a genius of realpolitik named Otto von Bismark. Bismark managed to engineer a series of alliances and disputes that culminated in the Austro-Prussian war in 1867 that enabled the Prussians to seize a large chunk of Austrian lands and unify their territories as the North German Confederation. This was the birth of Germany.

You may wonder why I wished to embark on such a long divergence, but I feel that to truly know a place one must understand the context in which it exists, and so the story of Germany which was explored not just in this post but in the last aims to do just that.

During this period in Cologne, interest renewed in finishing the cathedral and moving on from the by now centuries old crane that had long rusted into place. The nineteenth century was a period in which interest in old medieval architectural styles was renewed. While the sixteenth century had been marked by Renaissance and Mannerist churches, the seventeenth century by Baroque churches, and the eighteenth by other variations such as Rococo, the nineteenth saw a reversion to older techniques. Neoromanesque, Neogothic, and Neobyzantine all came into being. Interest flamed in restoring old structures, particularly thanks to preservationists like Victor Hugo. Simultaneously, the movement for German unification that I documented above was coming into full swing in the 1840s. Taking both of these together, one can understand why in the 1840s, the Prussian state (Protestant as you likely know if you have read this far) financed a large chunk of the building costs needed to finish the cathedral and the Central-Dombauverein, a civic organization, funded the rest. It was fundamentally from their perspective an elegy to German culture and history as well as a progressive welcoming of Catholics into the nationalist movement.

When it was completed in 1880, Kaiser Wilhelm I attended the consecration ceremony. It was the tallest building in the world at the time.

When Fr. Lammen and I arrived, we immediately proceeded to the Maternushaus, a hotel run by the Archdiocese of Cologne where we had booked rooms. We left our bags and then proceeded down the large Mass and Eucharistic procession celebrated in front of the Cathedral. Despite the cold and rainy conditions, there was a large crowd, and it was beautiful to see the devotion among the faithful gathered. Cardinal Woelki was the main celebrant, and the readings and intentions were read in Portuguese, German, Hungarian, Tagalog, Chinese, Italian, and Spanish. Every language, it seemed, except English. There was then a procession through the streets ending with a short ceremony in the Cathedral itself. The choir was spectacular, and I took some video that, when one combines the beautiful chant in Latin, the majestic stone cathedral, and the incense slowly rising to the arched ceiling, is sublime.

We then explored the city a bit more, stopping at St. Ursula’s, which houses the relics of that very saint. Her story is a bit difficult to parse apart given that the sources I have read all seem to agree that legend and history mingle a little too liberally for historians to be completely sure about all the details. However, the legend as it comes down to us states that Ursula was a British princess who went off to the continent to marry a foreign warrior who had asked for her hand in marriage. Having vowed chastity, however, she set off for Europe with a band of young maidens trained in the art of fighting. They arrived in Cologne and resolved to live together virtuously and live chaste lives. It happened that they were attacked by a band of Huns and all died to prevent being carried away in forced marriages. The traditional estimate of how many maidens died places them at 11,000, and while, as I said earlier, it is nearly impossible to verify that historically, the Church of St. Ursula is built on a Roman graveyard with masses of bones in it, which would line up with the scores of slain. Further, St. Anne Catherine Emmerich, known for writing down visions in which she was related parts of the life of Jesus and the early saints, related that according to her visions, Ursula set out with far fewer companions and was joined along the way by more.

However one figures the details, what is certain is that Ursula is a dear figure to Cologne, much as St. Genevieve is to Paris. She is an inspirational figure to this day.

After St. Ursula’s, we participated in a guided tour of St. Gereon’s Basilica, a beautiful Romanesque church that is dedicated to a late Roman soldier who was killed with his companions for his faith. The church is Romanesque and dates from the 700s. It has, however a decagonal shaped apse, which is itself Gothic.

We wrapped up the evening with a period of adoration organized by the conference we were attending.

Having become acquainted with the rich cultural and historical nature of Cologne, the next day the conference began, and we made the transition from Romanesque churches and medieval history to dynamic worship songs and strobe lights in a conference center.

The opening Mass was energizing and powerful, and the rest of the day was a wonderful combination of periodic Adoration and inspirational talks (mostly in German but with English translation provided through a headset for everyone else). However, for me, the main attraction was not the talks, well delivered though they were. For me, it was the networking.

At this conference were present hundreds of people from the Catholic world from all over Germany and Austria. There were many priests, bishops, and laypeople, all wanting to know how to reinvigorate their parishes and fall in love with Jesus. The energy was contagious, and I found myself loath to leave when the event was over. Fr. Ansgar had to leave on Thursday evening, and I left on Friday at midday. 

I took the train to Munster, where I met up with Fr. Charbel again and visited two of his Maronite parishes, one nearby and one in Enschede, Holland, where I spent the night. Fr. Charbel introduced me at the end of both Masses, and I delivered short remarks on the Children’s Rosary. I was so grateful for Fr. Charbel’s support of the initiative. He and I had the opportunity to speak a bit together while we were driving in the car, and he struck me as a very thoughtful and deep thinker. He is just finishing up a dissertation on the importance of celibacy to the priesthood.

The next day I took the train to Amsterdam. What became of me and what I saw there I will leave for the next post.

To see all of Asher's dispatches from his journey click HERE

Monday, July 6, 2026

Children's Rosary in Hamburg Honors the Sacred Heart of Jesus During the Month of June


As June is traditionally dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, the Children's Rosary in Hamburg, Germany met and made scapulars dedicated to the Sacred heart after their June meeting.








Saturday, July 4, 2026

Mass Offered for the Children's Rosary on July 4, 2026


During our time in Rome, we met Fr. Diaz, an Augustinian priest (shown left) and Fr. Julian, who is also an Augustinian from Colombia. Fr Julian was eager to take Children's Rosary materials and rosaries to help begin Children's Rosary groups when he returns to Colombia. 

Fr. Diaz is the Postulator for several causes in consideration for sainthood for the Augustinian order. We met him on the eve of the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul. He thought the Children's Rosary was marvelous and he said he did not have an intention for his first Saturday Masses and would like to offer his Mass for the Children's Rosary. The following evening he invited us to the Augustinian house adjacent to the Vatican. He gave us a tour and pointed out several pictures of Pope Leo during his time as superior of the Augustinians. 



Fr. Diaz had already reached out to contacts in his home country of Panama to help spread the Children's Rosary. We gave him Children's Rosary books and a Child Consecration book to help his efforts to spread the Children's Rosary. 


Sunday, June 28, 2026

Arrival in Germany

Asher Kaufman, at 18, set out on June 28, 2025 for a yearlong trip to help spread the Children's Rosary in Europe and Africa. He spent the months of July, August and the first two weeks in September in France. He went on to visit Belgium, Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar, South Africa, Cameroon, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Lesotho, Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia and Italy. This most recent post highlights his arrival in Germany. Asher has a love of history which animates this post. Today is also the 1 year anniversary of the day he set out on this trip.

Upon my departure from Assisi, I had on Monday a multi-leg day of travel, beginning with a 5:20 a.m. ride from the Casa Papa Giovanni down to the train station. At 6:10, I boarded my train for Arezzo, where I changed trains and embarked on a Frecciarossa in the direction of Rome. From the Roma Termini station where I got off, I then used the Leonardo express to take me directly to Fiumicino airport where I had my flight to Amsterdam.

For this period of my trip, it was a bit unclear up until the last minute where exactly I would be visiting; however, a couple of weeks before, a very nice German priest named Fr. Ansgar Lammen who had started a Children’s Rosary in his diocese of Osnabruck some years before, told me I could come visit his parish and that we could go together to a Eucharistic Congress in Cologne called the Kommt und Seht conference. This is an annual event organized by the Archdiocese of Cologne with many priest and bishops from all over Germany attending. Thus, having accepted Fr. Lammen’s kind invitation, I decided to start by going to his residence in Osnabruck. This meant that upon my arrival in Amsterdam, I immediately got on a German train heading in the direction of Osnabruck. The train was one of Deutsche Bahn’s new fleet, and I must say that with its cushioned, comfortable seats, carpeted floors, thick insulation, spacious bathrooms, silent sliding glass doors, and restaurant car, it was a very nice train. After about nearly three hours of riding the train, we arrived in Osnabruck. The train station was a quint, brick structure, and it was my introduction to the beautiful architecture of Germany.

After hauling out my bags from the train and tripping down the stairs and onto the plaza, I took an Uber to Fr. Lammen’s parish. That day had involved quite a large number of trains, and I was just glad that I had not committed some silly mistake like I had done on the way to Cascia, for in this instance, even the slightest error could have caused numerous downstream problems.

Fr. Lammen was on hand to receive me, helped me move the bags inside, and gave me something to eat before going to bed.

The next day, I had a meeting with Fr. Charbel Obeid, a Lebanese priest working in Münster. Münster was a short distance away by train, and it turned out to be a beautiful city to visit. I took the whole day to do this, especially since Fr. Lammen was busy with pastoral work.

I arrived around 11:00 a.m. and met Fr. Charbel at the train station. We went together to Mass at the Münster Cathedral and then walked around the city a bit. I had been eager to meet Fr. Charbel since he is in charge of a number of Maronite parishes in Germany and in the Netherlands. He is based out of Münster, however, and he was very familiar with the city.

The downtown of the city is very charming and has the appearance of being quite historic, even though in fact it was mostly destroyed during the Second World War and had to be built back postconflict. I have included some pictures as it is a nice area for walking around and munching on a strudel.

The story of Münster is quite an ancient one, and one place to begin is with Liudger, a pupil of Æthelbert in York, a very important bishop and scholar of the 700s. Liudger was one of a number of missionaries that Æthelbert sent out into northern Europe, which was still pagan at that time.

He arrived in Münster around 793 and built his community on a little hill called Horsteberg. Since this community was a monastic one, the name “Münster” comes from the Latin term “monasterium.” For the next several centuries and throughout the Middle Ages, the city continued to be an important center of trade and commerce. It found itself in the Hanseatic League, a loose alliance of states and guilds that shared economic interests.

The city, however, was shaken as much of Europe was by the nascent Protestant reformation that burst out of the small town of Wittenberg, far to the east.

After 1521, when Martin Luther publicly burned the Papal bull from Pope Leo X urging him to recant his heretical writings, the Protestant reformation was set off in earnest. In the wake of this act of schism, there were several different directions taken by the newly liberated vanguard. Luther himself emphasized his belief that salvation came through faith alone and that only the Bible served as a reliable source of authority for the Christian life.

Of course, another major sect of the nascent Protestant movement were the followers of Jean Calvin, a French theologian living in Switzerland who emphasized the doctrine of predestination, that is to say, that one is saved completely by God’s grace.

However, there was another group of Protestants, which are sometimes termed, perhaps unfairly, radical Reformers. These are probably best known by the figure of Heinrich Zwingli. The followers of Zwingli came to be known as Anabaptists. They were perhaps best known for their rejection of infant baptism. The Anabaptists sprang up in various of the more Protestant-inclined regions of Europe, such as Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, but one of the most notable stories of their early years comes from Münster.

In 1533, John of Leiden, a Dutch Anabaptist leader came to Münster with his religious mentor, Jan Matthys, and the two quickly gained notoriety for their speeches and writings, even being regarded by some as prophets.

On Easter Sunday of 1534, they rose up in a rebellion against the established leaders of the city. Matthys was killed, but the rebellion was successful, and Johann became the leader of the city.

For the next year, Münster underwent several quite radical measures under John’s leadership. Polygamy was not just permitted but normalized. Redistribution of wealth was taken to an almost proto-communist level. Citizens were even required to be naked to prepare for the Second Coming of Christ.

However, the new Anabaptist theocracy was short lived. By the next year, a German prince named Franz von Waldeck defeated John’s army and stormed the city, and its leader was captured. What ensued was a really quite regrettable series of tortures and executions, not just of John of Leiden but also of Bernhard Krechting and Bernhard Knipperdolling, two other accomplices and leaders of the city. The three men were ripped apart with red-hot tongs while being held in place by an iron-spiked collar and were then run through the heart with daggers. This was all done in the central square, and once that was finished, their bodies were hung up to the steeple of St. Lambert’s Church in cages. Though the bodies have long since been removed, the cages remain hung to the church steeple to this day and can still be seen. I, unfortunately, did not get the chance to visit St. Lambert’s Church while I was in Münster, but if I had, I would have been able to see the grim sight.

Just over a hundred years later, however, the city of Münster again made its way into the history books in a perhaps much more notable case. Another name for the city is Westphalia, and indeed the Peace of Westphalia was signed in this very place.

To understand the import of something like the Peace of Westphalia, it is absolutely essential to understand the conflict that preceded it, namely the Thirty Years’ War. The Thirty Years’ War was likely one of the bloodiest and most brutal conflicts Europe had known up until that time, and it involved almost all of the major geopolitical players of its time. 

To properly understand it, one must begin with the state of the Holy Roman Empire at the dawn of the seventeenth century. At that time, the Holy Roman Empire (roughly Germany and Austria today) was in a state of political and cultural disarray. It had still a rather decentralized political structure as compared to the ascendant absolutist monarchs of France, England, and certainly Spain. The number of Lutherans and Catholics were almost evenly split in the empire, and the Peace of Augsburg from the 1550s left local towns to decide which church they would follow. For example, in Fr. Lammen’s region, the towns were a patchwork of Catholicism and Lutheranism, even within a few kilometers of each other. By the early 1600s, small rival leagues had formed amongst the different little principalities, divided along religious lines. Culturally, Italy had been the center of the Renaissance a century before and had retained a place as a center of art and literature. The Northern Renaissance had emerged out of the Netherlands and Belgium, and the Elizabethan era had led to a flourishing of English artistic expression, such as the works of Shakespeare. All of this left the Holy Roman Empire quite behind politically and culturally.

By the 1610s, a new religious sect appeared on the scene, the Calvinists. These had not previously been in the empire, and their existence posed a threat to the already tenuous peace between Lutherans and Catholics.

Around this time, a particularly ambitious new emperor arrived on the throne, Ferdinand II. He wished to unify the empire along religious lines and reassert Catholicism as the dominant church within his realm.

However, the Holy Roman Empire did not operate along absolutist lines. The emperor was elected by seven princes from different regions. One of these regions, Bohemia, was largely Protestant and flatly rejected Ferdinand’s authority. They elected their own emperor, Frederick V, a Calvinist.

In response, an army loyal to Ferdinand marched on this rebellious province and defeated Frederick at the Battle of White Mountain.

However, as would happen often throughout the Thirty Years’ War, the hostilities did not cease as soon as they might have because Ferdinand overstepped his cards. He had the nobles disloyal to him stripped of their lands and the holdings passed over to his own henchmen, thus disenfranchising a whole faction of his empire. This would not hold.

While the German Protestants were still licking their wounds, many other states in Europe reacted in alarm to the new ascent of the Holy Roman Empire. King Christian IV of Denmark, a Lutheran kingdom to the north of the Holy Roman Empire, seeing an opportunity to step in on behalf of his vanquished fellow Lutherans as well as to seize additional territory for his kingdom, marched south to try to roll back the armies of Ferdinand II. In fact, Christian IV was also the Duke of Holstein, a northern German bishopric, and thus he was tied up in an alliance with Brandenberg and Saxony, two other Protestant regions whose dukes were concerned about the prospect of increasing Catholicization under Ferdinand II. The English, Dutch, and indirectly the French as well agreed to fund this new campaign in a bid to knock Ferdinand II off of his newly empowered position. Thanks to the support of this newly-bubbled up alliance, Christian IV planned a rather complex three-pronged attack south into Germany that would attack Magdeburg, Brandenburg, and Pomerania.

However, unfortunately for all of them, Ferdinand contracted the assistance of a powerful ally of his own, a mercenary general named Albrecht Wallenstein. Wallenstein proved more than a match. He was one of those highly intelligent and analytic but also quite ruthless calculators who often found ways to victory even if he incurred heavy losses.

Christian’s vaunted three-pronged invasion collapsed after defeats at Dessau Bridge and Lutter. Wallenstein pushed north and captured territory as far north as Jutland.

However, it was precisely at this point when Ferdinand had beaten back the nascent alliance just burst forth from the womb of political alliances to oppose him that he made perhaps the greatest diplomatic blunder of the whole conflict. He passed the imperial Edict of Restitution without consultation with the electors or dukes of the empire. The Edict required all Catholic lands to be returned to the Church and that all the state boundaries be brought back to the way they had been in 1555 and that many of the Protestant principalities become officially Catholic again even though they had not been so in many years. The edict was an imperial decree that did not need the approval of the local rulers, but here Ferdinand was dangerously overextending his political clout. He was also overextended militarily since had committed troops in Italy to aid the Duke of Guastalia to claim rule over Mantua. Not only this, but Ferdinand’s main ally, Spain, was rapidly losing ground in its war against the Dutch rebels in the Netherlands. Recall that until this point, the Low Countries were controlled by the Spanish. There had been a conflict going on for many decades known as the Eighty Years’ War in which these largely Protestant kingdoms attempted to gain their independence from Spain. In the 1620s, they had scored victory after victory against the Spanish, forcing Philip of Spain to play more conservatively with the German Protestant princes.

Smelling copious blood in the water, King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, another Lutheran kingdom, decided to throw his hat in the increasingly crowded ring. He had just been freed from a war against the Catholic Poles by a diplomatic treaty in part brokered by the ever-active Cardinal Richelieu of France. However, Richelieu did not stop there. In order to grease the gears of alliance between Gustavus Adolphus and the German Protestants, Richelieu committed to extensive funding of the Swedish offensive. A whole separate sidenote is likely warranted on Richelieu, one of the largest figures in statesmanship and manipulation Europe has known. I speak of him as though he were the ruler of France. Some of you might have already remarked that the official ruler of that country at this time was in fact Louis XIII, but Richelieu is often considered to be the real kingmaker behind French politics, someone who lived through more than one king and who was one of the most powerful men in Europe at the time. His dogged rather realpolitikal promotion of French interest above all else did much to contribute to modern European nationalism. To understand why the French, Catholics as they were, would play such a critical role in the support of Protestant interests, it is important to see that the Bourbon rulers of France and the Habsburg rulers of the Holy Roman Empire and Spain were consummate rivals, despite the Catholicity they shared. In fact, I would argue the Thirty Years’ War was far more about dynastic warfare rather than religious warfare since nearly every actor that entered the war did so for his own political and economic interests primarily.

To return, however, to Gustavus Adolphus, he encountered victory after victory in Germany, pushing as far south as Bavaria. However, in the Battle of Lutzen, Adolphus was killed by the imperialist forces. Wallenstein’s days were numbered too. He had always been a mercenary soldier, and his personality and constant absence from court had enabled negative rumors to begin to spread about the empire. The Spanish Habsburgs did not care for him as he had done nothing to help them in the Eighty Years’ War, and Ferdinand was dissatisfied with his repeated losses to the Swedes. Having made his decision to flee to the Swedes, Wallenstein sealed his fate. A dragoon of Scottish and Irish soldiers were sent to kill him, and so they did.

Left without their respective commanders, the Swedes and Austrians continued their campaigns, with the result of a Habsburg victory at Nordlingen in 1634. By 1635, the Peace of Prague is signed promising peace and re-unification of the Holy Roman Empire.

However, this peace did not please the French at all since it left the Holy Roman Empire in a strengthened position. Throwing his hat in the ring, Louis XIII sent in French troops to take on Spain and the Habsburgs.

The result brought about a great strengthening of the Dutch position to the point that by 1644, their independence seemed all but inevitable.

In Germany, the result was a bit harder to decipher. At first, it seemed the Habsburgs would win, scoring important victories at Tuttlingen and Herbsthausen. However, by 1646, the French and Swedes struck afresh as far as Bavaria and by May 1648 decisively defeated a Bavarian army at Zusmarshausen.

At this point, Ferdinand III (Ferdinand II had died some years before) realized that to continue fighting was futile. His cousins in Spain, beaten back after a pitiful campaign into Flanders that year, came to the same conclusion. With the Swedes and French riding high, peace was sued for.

The peace negotiations to such a long and complicated war, really a convergence of several wars, took years and involved literally hundreds of delegates and meetings. Recall that there even was an Italian theater to this conflict which I hardly described.

In the end, the lasting implications of the agreement meant that the Holy Roman Empire became more decentralized than ever. The power of the principalities was bolstered, and Germany was put in a weaker position than ever. Further, the empire was forced to recognize Calvinism as a co-official religion next to Lutheranism and Catholicism. Additionally, the Swiss Cantons as well as the Netherlands gain their independence, carving out two new small Protestant kingdoms in Europe, one split away from the Holy Roman Empire and one from Spain.

This would enable the Dutch commercial endeavors of later decades and even begin setting the fodder for the political context that would lead to German nationalism many centuries in the future.


(Source: Wiki Commons)

And a large part of those negotiations took place in Münster at the Peace Hall which is pictured above. If you have survived with me as far as here, hopefully you have an appreciation for the enormous importance of the Peace of Westphalia and thus of the city of Münster in tying together one of the most significant wars in European history.

Having given so much space to the Thirty Years’ War, I fear none is left for Münster Cathedral, and thus I leave it to the reader to do the corresponding research on that splendid structure.

After walking around a bit with Fr. Charbel, we made an arrangement to see each other again at one of his parishes on that Saturday afternoon, and I headed back to Osnabrück.

I arrived back at Fr. Lammen’s house just after he arrived that evening, and we had dinner together.

The next day we spent visiting some of the other churches of his parishes, and then we headed off to Cologne for the Eucharistic conference held there that week. Both of those events along with my meeting with Fr. Charbel and my subsequent trip into the Netherlands will be covered in the coming posts.

To see all of Asher's dispatches from his journey click HERE